Skip to content

Akeyless vs. Keeper: Defining the Next Generation of Modern PAM

Summary:

Modern organizations evaluating Privileged Access Management increasingly compare Akeyless and Keeper to address rising cloud, DevOps, and machine identity challenges. Keeper extends a password-vault foundation into PAM, offering familiar workflows for human access. Akeyless takes a different approach, designed for Zero Standing Privilege with ephemeral, on-demand credentials for both humans and machines, plus unified Secrets Management, KMS, and Certificate Lifecycle Management. For teams seeking automation at scale, fewer stored secrets, and a consolidated identity and encryption platform, Akeyless is often the preferred choice.

Privileged access has become one of the most targeted and difficult areas of enterprise security. As organizations adopt cloud-native architectures, scale automation, and rely on growing numbers of machine identities, traditional approaches built around static passwords and vaulting struggle to keep up. Security teams are now prioritizing Zero Standing Privilege, native cloud integration, and consolidated control over secrets, keys, and access.

In this environment, many enterprises compare Akeyless and Keeper to determine which platform aligns best with modern infrastructure requirements. While both solutions have PAM capabilities, their underlying architectures and security models differ significantly. Understanding these differences is essential for teams looking to reduce operational overhead, eliminate unnecessary stored secrets, and support both human and machine access across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

The Evolution of PAM: Beyond Password Vaults

Traditional PAM platforms were built for on-premises servers and human administrators, relying on static vaults, password rotation, and session proxies. These approaches made sense when identities were long-lived and workloads were stable. Today, infrastructure is distributed across clouds, containers, and ephemeral compute, and access automation is essential for both security and operational velocity.

Akeyless Modern PAM rethinks privileged access for this new landscape by replacing static passwords with on-demand, dynamic credentials and extending Zero Standing Privilege to both human and machine identities.

Keeper has evolved its PAM capabilities as well, supporting JIT workflows and access for workloads and other non-human identities. However, its architecture still centers around a vault-based modele thatrelies on stored credentials, and discrete components that add operational overhead. This matters for buyers comparing Akeyless vs. Keeper, particularly in automation-heavy or machine-identity environments.

Architecture Comparison: Akeyless and Keeper

FeatureAkeylessKeeper
Core DesignBorn as a unified machine identity & PAM platformExtended from password manager
Architecture TypeZero-Knowledge (Distributed Fragments Cryptography™)Vault-based, client-side encryption
Identity CoverageHumans, machines, workloadsHuman, machine, workload 
Unified PlatformSecrets, PAM, KMS, CLM in oneSeparate modules (EPM, KSM, KCM, KPM)
DeploymentInstant SaaS + optional lightweight GatewaySaaS + gateway, plus endpoint agents
Standing CredentialsNone – credentials generated and revoked dynamicallyTemporary credentials created only for sessions

Akeyless replaces stored credentials with ephemeral, cryptographically generated secrets that never exist until needed. Keeper, while user-friendly, still depends on vault-based storage and separate services to mimic a unified platform. This is a core distinction for those researching Keeper alternatives seeking to reduce vault dependence.

Zero Standing Privilege: How Akeyless and Keeper Differ

Akeyless enforces Zero Standing Privilege (ZSP) by design. When a user or machine needs access, Akeyless generates a short-lived credential on-demand, valid only for minutes, and automatically revokes it after use. No passwords are stored, and no vault ever contains live secrets.

Keeper, by contrast, simulates ZSP through session-layer controls. Its temporary accounts and post-session rotations reduce exposure but still rely on underlying vault-based password storage.

Akeyless provides a deeper, infrastructure-level enforcement of ZSP, protecting privileged access across humans, workloads, and automation pipelines, not just individual sessions.

Machine Identity Native, Not an Add-On

Akeyless was built for modern infrastructure. It integrates directly with:

  • AWS IAM Roles, Azure Managed Identities, GCP Service Accounts
  • Kubernetes workloads, Jenkins, GitLab, Terraform, and Ansible
  • mTLS, OIDC, and SPIFFE/SPIRE frameworks

Machines and workloads can authenticate using their native identities, eliminating “secrets for secrets” and enabling fully automated, least-privilege access.

Keeper’s PAM and Secrets Manager lacks native multi-cloud IAM integration and relies on API keys or configuration files for machine access, creating residual standing secrets. Keeper does support AWS IAM roles, Kubernetes workloads, and DevOps tool integration (Jenkins, GitLab, Terraform, Ansible, etc.) Keeper partially supports Azure Managed Identities (via Azure environment parameters) and GCP Service Accounts (coming soon/limited). Moreover, Keeper does not appear to publicly document support for SPIFFE/SPIRE or full mTLS workload identity frameworks.

With Akeyless, machines, humans, and services share the same Zero-Trust fabric.

Unified Control for Secrets, Access, and Encryption

Akeyless is the only Zero-Knowledge PAM platform that unifies:

All managed from a single SaaS control plane, with consistent policy, audit, and access controls.

Keeper requires separate modules:

  • Keeper Secrets Manager (for DevOps secrets)
  • Keeper Connection Manager (for remote access)
  • Keeper Endpoint Privilege Manager (for endpoints)
  • Keeper Password Manager (for user vaults)

This fragmentation increases cost, complexity, and integration effort — while Akeyless provides instant scalability, unified compliance, and one API for all identity and encryption needs.

Zero-Knowledge Encryption with Patented Distributed Fragments Cryptography™ (DFC™)

With patented Distributed Fragments Cryptography™ (DFC):

  • Encryption keys are split into fragments.
  • One fragment remains with the customer, ensuring Akeyless can never reconstruct the key.
  • Secrets and credentials are encrypted in real-time, decrypted locally, and destroyed after use.
  • Optional HSM integration allows enterprises to bring their own root-of-trust.

Keeper’s vault-based approach still requires client-side private keys stored on user devices or services, increasing exposure and operational complexity.

With Akeyless, no complete key, credential, or secret ever exists in one place, ensuring true Zero-Knowledge compliance.

Seamless SaaS Deployment and Scale

Akeyless offers an agentless, containerized deployment model that scales automatically across multi-cloud and hybrid environments. Admins can deploy an Akeyless Gateway in minutes, with no need to modify firewalls, networks, or endpoints.

Keeper PAM continues to require the deployment of a Keeper Gateway service, and for endpoint privilege management, an agent on each workstation, which adds infrastructure overhead. By contrast, Akeyless Modern PAM is architected to minimise on-prem dependencies and supports an agentless or lightweight gateway-optional model.

Akeyless provides enterprise-grade scalability and 99.99% uptime through its global SaaS infrastructure, with no professional services required for upgrades or expansion.

Unified Governance and Audit

Akeyless centralizes every operation under a single governance framework:

  • Unified RBAC/ABAC policies for all users and machines
  • Granular policy enforcement by time, IP, context, and role
  • Comprehensive audit trail across secrets, PAM, and key operations
  • SIEM integrations with Splunk, Datadog, and Elastic

Keeper PAM now provides a unified audit and reporting framework across password, secrets and privileged access modules, enabling centralized event streaming and SIEM integration, rather than requiring manual correlation across disparate logs.

With Akeyless, compliance, reporting, and auditing are instantaneous and centralized, simplifying operations while strengthening control.

Enterprise-Grade Compliance and Resilience

Akeyless aligns with:

  • SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and DORA
  • FIPS 140-2 Level 3 for cryptographic operations
  • Post-Quantum-Ready Encryption (Hybrid TLS 1.3 with ML-KEM768)
  • Government and Defense readiness under development (FedRAMP in process)

Keeper holds  FedRAMP Moderate certification for its vault-based PAM environment.

Akeyless provides broader cryptographic assurance across multiple compliance regimes with quantum-resilient security, ensuring long-term data protection.

Why Enterprises Choose Akeyless Over Keeper

  • Unified Zero-Knowledge architecture replaces multiple point solutions
  • Zero Standing Privilege across humans, machines, and workloads
  • Zero-Knowledge Encryption with patented DFC™ ensures no single point of compromise 
  • Instant SaaS deployment, no agents, no firewalls, no maintenance
  • Enterprise-scale automation for DevOps and hybrid cloud
  • Post-quantum cryptography for future resilience
  • Transparent pricing with lower TCO

Keeper’s PAM may suffice for simple human, machines, and workloads access management, but for enterprises moving toward cloud-native automation, Akeyless delivers the complete modern PAM vision.

Verdict: The Future of PAM Is Dynamic and Unified

Keeper extended its password vault into a PAM suite.
Akeyless redesigned PAM entirely, transforming privileged access into a dynamic, cryptographic identity framework that spans every system, cloud, and workload.

Where Keeper manages passwords, Akeyless eliminates them.
Where Keeper rotates secrets, Akeyless never stores them.
Where Keeper connects sessions, Akeyless unifies identities.

For modern, hybrid enterprises seeking security without complexity, Akeyless is the new standard in Privileged Access Management.

Next Steps

Eliminate vaults, passwords, and standing credentials, and embrace the future of privileged access.

Request an Akeyless demo to experience the unified, vaultless, Zero-Knowledge PAM platform trusted by leading global enterprises.

FAQs

What is the main difference between Akeyless and Keeper?

Akeyless is a Zero-Knowledge PAM platform built around Dynamic Secrets and machine identity, while Keeper extends a password-vault architecture into PAM. Akeyless eliminates stored credentials during access workflows by issuing ephemeral, on-demand credentials, whereas Keeper relies on vault-based storage and session controls. This difference shapes how each platform scales across cloud, DevOps, and automation.dge framework.

Is Keeper a good alternative to Akeyless for Privileged Access Management?

Keeper can be a fit for organizations with primarily human-centric access requirements, but it is not a complete alternative for teams prioritizing native machine identity, ephemeral credentials, or full Zero Standing Privilege. Akeyless issues short-lived credentials only when needed and unifies Secrets Management, KMS, PAM, and CLM in a single platform, reducing architectural complexity.

Does Keeper support Just-in-Time (JIT) access like Akeyless?

Keeper offers JIT access for human sessions, but these workflows depend on stored credentials and session-layer controls. Akeyless delivers JIT natively by generating ephemeral credentials for both users and machines, with no stored passwords and no credential persistence.

Can Akeyless replace Keeper Secrets Manager and other Keeper modules?

Yes. Akeyless consolidates Secrets Management, PAM, KMS, and Certificate Lifecycle Management into one SaaS control plane. This enables organizations to replace multiple Keeper modules and standalone encryption or certificate tools.

Which platform is easier to scale: Akeyless or Keeper?

Akeyless. It operates as a multi-region SaaS platform with stateless Gateways that auto-scale globally. Keeper requires gateway servers and endpoint agents for full PAM functionality, which adds operational overhead, especially in distributed, multi-cloud environments.

How do Akeyless and Keeper handle machine identities?

Akeyless integrates natively with AWS IAM Roles, Azure Managed Identities, GCP Service Accounts, Kubernetes identities, mTLS, OIDC, and SPIFFE/SPIRE. Keeper relies primarily on API keys or configuration files, with partial support for cloud IAM. Organizations with automation-heavy or cloud-native workflows typically prefer Akeyless.

Why do enterprises choose Akeyless over Keeper?

Enterprises choose Akeyless for its Zero-Knowledge architecture, native machine identity support, dynamic credential workflows, unified secrets and encryption services, and lower operational overhead. It is designed for cloud-native automation rather than adapted from a password vault.

Is Akeyless a good Keeper alternative for DevOps teams?

Yes. Akeyless integrates directly with Kubernetes, Terraform, Jenkins, GitLab, and cloud IAM providers to provide native, identity-driven authentication for machines and workloads. This reduces reliance on static secrets and improves automation reliability compared to vault-based workflows.

Does Keeper support Dynamic Secrets like Akeyless?

Keeper supports temporary session credentials and rotations but does not provide Dynamic Secrets at the infrastructure level. Akeyless creates cryptographically generated, short-lived credentials on demand, eliminating stored secrets during access workflows.

Never Miss an Update

The latest news and insights about Secrets Management,
Akeyless, and the community we serve.

 

Ready to get started?

Discover how Akeyless simplifies secrets management, reduces sprawl, minimizes risk, and saves time.

Book a Demo