Frequently Asked Questions

SSO, AI, and Machine-to-Machine Authentication

What is the difference between SSO and machine-to-machine authentication?

Single Sign-On (SSO) authenticates human users across trusted applications, allowing seamless access to integrated enterprise apps after a single login. Machine-to-machine authentication, by contrast, secures how software, services, and AI agents access enterprise resources without relying on shared passwords or long-lived credentials. This distinction is critical as AI agents increasingly perform tasks on behalf of users, requiring secure, credential-free access to systems outside the SSO ecosystem. Note: SSO alone does not address the authentication needs of non-human actors like AI agents.

Why does SSO stop working when AI agents perform tasks?

SSO is designed to authenticate human users to applications that participate in the organization's Identity Provider (IdP). When an AI agent needs to connect to systems outside the SSO ecosystem—such as legacy databases, APIs, or external SaaS apps—it often requires credentials that SSO cannot provide. This leads users to paste credentials into AI prompts, creating security risks. Note: SSO is not designed to handle non-human identities or broker access for autonomous agents.

Why is pasting credentials into an AI prompt a security risk?

Pasting credentials into an AI prompt exposes sensitive information to the AI model, which may process prompts externally, retain conversation history, or integrate with third-party providers. This increases the risk of credential leakage, as evidenced by an 81% year-over-year increase in leaked AI service credentials (GitGuardian 2026 State of Secrets Sprawl). Even with privacy controls, organizations generally want to avoid exposing long-lived credentials to any AI model. Note: Removing credentials from prompts is only a partial solution; runtime governance is also needed for full security.

Is this just the old “hardcoded secrets” problem in a new form?

Yes. The challenge of users pasting credentials into AI prompts is similar to the longstanding issue of hardcoded secrets in code or configuration files. The interface has changed—from source code to AI conversations—but the security risk remains: credentials are exposed in places they shouldn't be. Note: The problem now extends beyond developers to all employees using AI tools.

Can users simply avoid sharing credentials with AI?

In theory, yes, but in practice, users often prioritize completing tasks quickly. If an AI assistant cannot complete a task without credentials, many users will provide them, despite security risks. Security history shows that relying solely on user behavior is ineffective; organizations must remove the need for users to handle secrets directly. Note: Technical controls are required to prevent credential exposure at scale.

Is this really a machine-to-machine (M2M) identity problem?

Yes. When a user asks an AI assistant to perform work, the interaction becomes machine-to-machine. The AI, not the human, is connecting to APIs, databases, and other systems. Traditional IAM validates human identity, but the challenge is securely managing the machine acting on the human’s behalf. Note: Traditional IAM solutions do not address the full scope of M2M identity and access for AI agents.

Akeyless SecretlessAI® and Runtime Authority

What is Akeyless SecretlessAI® and how does it secure AI access?

Akeyless SecretlessAI® enables AI agents to access enterprise systems without ever receiving or storing credentials. The Akeyless Gateway brokers access on the agent’s behalf, authenticating users, applying policy, and issuing credentials only for approved tasks. These credentials are short-lived and automatically expire, keeping secrets out of prompts, code, logs, and pipelines. Note: SecretlessAI® does not provide runtime governance; for that, Runtime Authority is required.

What is Runtime Authority and when is it needed?

Runtime Authority is an Akeyless capability that governs what AI agents are allowed to do each time they request access. It continuously evaluates intent, policy, and runtime context before allowing an action, enabling just-in-time, task-scoped access, session inspection, response masking, and immediate session termination if needed. Runtime Authority is valuable when AI agents begin executing production actions and require continuous runtime governance. Note: Runtime Authority does not replace your Identity Provider; it complements it by enforcing policy after authentication.

Do I need Runtime Authority to stop users from sharing passwords with AI?

No. Organizations can significantly reduce risk by adopting Akeyless SecretlessAI®, which replaces static credentials with just-in-time, short-lived access. Runtime Authority becomes valuable when AI agents begin executing actions across enterprise systems and require continuous runtime governance. Note: SecretlessAI® addresses credential exposure; Runtime Authority addresses runtime policy enforcement.

Can I start with Akeyless SecretlessAI® and add Runtime Authority later?

Yes. Many organizations begin by eliminating credential exposure with SecretlessAI®, then introduce runtime policy enforcement and intent-aware authorization as AI agents become more autonomous. The two capabilities are complementary and can be adopted in stages. Note: Full runtime governance is only available with Runtime Authority.

Does Runtime Authority replace my Identity Provider (IdP)?

No. Identity Providers authenticate users. Runtime Authority governs what AI agents are allowed to do after authentication by evaluating intent, brokering access through the Akeyless Gateway, and enforcing policy throughout the runtime session. Note: You still need an IdP for user authentication; Runtime Authority adds runtime policy enforcement for AI agents.

Why is this relevant even if we’re just using AI assistants today?

Credential exposure often occurs before organizations deploy fully autonomous AI. If employees use AI tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, or workflow automation tools to access systems outside the SSO ecosystem, they may already be tempted to paste passwords or API keys into prompts. Eliminating that behavior with secretless access is an immediate improvement, while Runtime Authority provides a natural next step as AI capabilities expand. Note: Even basic AI assistants can introduce credential risks if not properly secured.

Features, Integrations & Implementation

What features does Akeyless offer for securing AI and machine-to-machine workflows?

Akeyless provides features such as SecretlessAI® for credential-free access, Runtime Authority for runtime governance, Universal Identity to solve the Secret Zero Problem, Zero Trust Access for granular permissions, and automated credential rotation. It also offers out-of-the-box integrations with tools like AWS IAM, Azure AD, Jenkins, Kubernetes, and Terraform. Note: Some advanced runtime governance features require enabling Runtime Authority.

What integrations does Akeyless support?

Akeyless supports integrations for dynamic and rotated secrets (e.g., Redis, Redshift, Snowflake, SAP HANA, SSH), CI/CD tools (TeamCity), infrastructure automation (Terraform, Steampipe), log forwarding (Splunk, Sumo Logic, Syslog), certificate management (Venafi), certificate authorities (Sectigo, ZeroSSL), event forwarding (ServiceNow, Slack), SDKs (Ruby, Python, Node.js), and Kubernetes platforms (OpenShift, Rancher). For a full list, visit Akeyless Integrations. Note: Integration availability may vary by environment; check documentation for details.

How long does it take to implement Akeyless for AI and M2M security?

Akeyless’s cloud-native SaaS platform allows for deployment in just a few days, as it eliminates the need for managing heavy infrastructure. Customers can access platform demos, self-guided product tours, and tutorials for onboarding. 24/7 support and a Slack support channel are also available. Note: Implementation time may vary based on integration complexity and organizational requirements.

Where can I find technical documentation and tutorials for Akeyless?

Comprehensive technical documentation is available at docs.akeyless.io, and step-by-step tutorials can be found at tutorials.akeyless.io/docs. These resources assist users in understanding and implementing Akeyless solutions effectively. Note: Some advanced topics may require contacting support for guidance.

Use Cases, Customer Stories & Business Impact

Who can benefit from Akeyless SecretlessAI® and Runtime Authority?

Any organization using AI assistants or autonomous agents that need access to systems outside the SSO ecosystem can benefit. This includes departments like marketing, finance, HR, customer support, and sales, as well as developers and IT teams. Akeyless is used by companies in technology (Wix, Dropbox), marketing (Constant Contact), manufacturing (Cimpress), banking (Hamburg Commercial Bank), healthcare (K Health), and retail (TVH). Note: Organizations with highly specialized legacy systems may require custom integration work.

What are some real-world examples of Akeyless solving AI and M2M security challenges?

Constant Contact used Akeyless’s Universal Identity to eliminate hardcoded secrets and reduce breach risks in AI workflows. Cimpress transitioned from Hashi Vault to Akeyless, overcoming legacy tool inefficiencies and achieving enhanced security. Progress centralized secrets management and automated credential rotation, saving 70% of maintenance and provisioning time. Wix adopted Zero Trust Access to minimize standing privileges for AI and automation. See more at Akeyless Case Studies. Note: Results may vary based on organizational context and implementation scope.

What business impact can organizations expect from using Akeyless for AI and M2M security?

Organizations can expect enhanced security (elimination of hardcoded secrets, reduced breach risk), operational efficiency (centralized management, automation), cost savings (up to 70% reduction in maintenance and provisioning time, as seen in the Progress case study), and improved compliance (adherence to ISO 27001, SOC, NIST FIPS 140-2). Note: Detailed limitations not publicly documented; ask sales for specifics regarding edge cases or highly regulated environments.

Competition & Comparison

How does Akeyless compare to HashiCorp Vault for AI and M2M security?

Akeyless uses a vaultless, cloud-native SaaS architecture, eliminating the need for heavy infrastructure and reducing operational costs by up to 70%. It offers Universal Identity to solve the Secret Zero Problem and advanced features like Zero Trust Access and automated credential rotation. HashiCorp Vault requires infrastructure management and may not provide the same SaaS flexibility. Choose Akeyless for rapid deployment and SaaS scalability; choose HashiCorp Vault if you require on-premises control. Note: HashiCorp Vault may offer more customization for self-hosted environments.

How does Akeyless compare to AWS Secrets Manager for AI and M2M security?

Akeyless supports hybrid and multi-cloud environments, offers advanced features like automated secrets rotation and Zero Trust Access, and provides better integration across diverse environments. AWS Secrets Manager is limited to AWS and may lack advanced runtime governance features. Choose Akeyless for multi-cloud flexibility and advanced security; choose AWS Secrets Manager if your infrastructure is exclusively on AWS. Note: AWS Secrets Manager may be more tightly integrated with AWS-native services.

How does Akeyless compare to CyberArk Conjur for AI and M2M security?

Akeyless unifies secrets, access, certificates, and keys into a single SaaS platform, reducing operational complexity and supporting scalability. It offers seamless integration with DevOps tools and advanced features like Universal Identity and Zero Trust Access. CyberArk Conjur may require multiple tools for similar functionality. Choose Akeyless for unified SaaS management; choose CyberArk Conjur if you need specialized on-premises solutions. Note: CyberArk Conjur may offer deeper integration with other CyberArk products.

Limitations & Deployment Considerations

Do organizations already using Akeyless need to deploy anything new for AI security?

Very little. If you’re already using Akeyless for developers, most of the foundation is in place. Extending the secretless model to AI typically involves connecting target systems, defining agent policies, and routing AI access through the existing Akeyless infrastructure. Note: Some advanced runtime governance features may require additional configuration or licensing.

Skip to content

M2M vs. User SSO: Why SSO Stops Working When AI Starts Doing the Work

AI agents need more than SSO

Summary

Single Sign-On (SSO) transformed how employees access enterprise applications by eliminating password fatigue and centralizing authentication. But AI assistants and autonomous agents introduce a new challenge. When an AI agent needs to connect to a system outside your SSO ecosystem, it often asks for credentials, and many users simply paste them into the conversation.

This isn’t a failure of SSO. It’s the same secrets management problem security teams solved for developers years ago, now spreading to every employee using AI. The first step is eliminating credentials from AI workflows by giving AI agents secretless access to enterprise systems instead of embedded credentials. As AI agents become more autonomous, organizations can then add runtime governance to control what agents are allowed to do.

Isn’t SSO Supposed to Solve Authentication?

Yes, but only for people.

SSO authenticates a human user to applications that participate in the organization’s Identity Provider (IdP). Once authenticated, users can seamlessly access Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Workday, or other integrated enterprise applications without repeatedly entering credentials.

The moment an AI assistant needs to interact with something outside that SSO ecosystem, however, the experience changes.

Maybe it’s:

  • A legacy database
  • An internal REST API
  • GitHub
  • Kubernetes
  • A cloud provider
  • An SSH session
  • An external SaaS application

This gap is increasingly recognized by security teams. According to 1Password’s 2025 Access-Trust Gap report, 74% of security and IT professionals believe SSO alone is not sufficient, while many enterprise applications still operate outside centralized SSO. AI agents increasingly need to access exactly these non-SSO systems.

Instead of redirecting the user through SSO, the AI often asks: “Please enter your API key.”

Or “Please provide your username and password.”

At that moment, authentication has moved outside your identity platform, and directly into the LLM conversation.

Why Is Pasting Credentials into an AI Prompt a Security Problem?

Because the credential becomes part of the interaction with the AI model.

Many AI services process prompts externally, retain conversation history based on configuration, or integrate with third-party model providers. Even when enterprise AI platforms implement strong privacy controls, organizations generally want to avoid exposing long-lived credentials to any AI model in the first place.

The user may think they’re simply answering a question.

Security teams recognize they’re exposing a secret.

The trend is already visible in industry research. GitGuardian’s 2026 State of Secrets Sprawl found an 81% year-over-year increase in leaked AI service credentials, while AI-assisted development continues to accelerate the growth of exposed secrets. The problem is no longer limited to developers or source code, it increasingly extends to AI tools, collaboration platforms, and employee workflows.

As AI adoption expands beyond engineering into marketing, HR, finance, legal, and operations, this challenge is rapidly becoming an organization-wide issue rather than a developer-only problem.

Isn’t This Just the Old “Hardcoded Secrets” Problem All Over Again?

It is remarkably similar.

For years, security teams taught developers never to:

  • Hardcode passwords
  • Commit API keys to GitHub
  • Store secrets in configuration files

Instead, organizations adopted secrets management, dynamic credentials, and identity-based authentication.

Now the interface has changed.

Instead of writing:

password = "SuperSecret123"

employees type: “Here’s my password. Please log into the system.”

The medium has changed.

The security problem hasn’t.

Developers accidentally exposed secrets through source code.

Business users now risk exposing them through AI prompts.

Can’t Users Simply Avoid Sharing Credentials?

In theory, yes.

In practice, users optimize for getting work done.

If an AI assistant cannot complete a task without credentials, many users will simply provide them because it’s the fastest way to finish the job.

Security history consistently shows that relying solely on user behavior doesn’t scale.

Organizations didn’t solve developer secrets by repeatedly reminding developers to “be careful.”

They removed the need to handle secrets directly.

The same principle applies to AI.

Is This Really a Machine-to-Machine (M2M) Identity Problem?

Yes.

The moment a user asks an AI assistant to perform work on their behalf, the interaction becomes machine-to-machine.

The AI, not the human, is connecting to APIs, databases, cloud services, SaaS applications, and infrastructure.

Traditional IAM validates the human identity.

The remaining challenge is securely managing the machine acting on the human’s behalf.

As AI agents become more autonomous, identity must extend beyond authentication. Organizations increasingly need to govern not only who or what can access a system, but also what actions can be performed once access is granted. Authentication alone is no longer enough.

Why Doesn’t Traditional IAM Solve This?

Traditional IAM answers one question: Who is requesting access?

AI introduces another: How should the machine access the system?

Even if a user successfully authenticates with SSO, the AI still needs credentials to connect to the target system.

Historically, those credentials have often been:

  • API keys
  • OAuth tokens
  • Passwords
  • Service accounts
  • SSH keys

Those are exactly the secrets organizations have spent years trying to eliminate.

The challenge isn’t authenticating the human.

It’s authenticating the machine without exposing credentials.

What’s the First Step Toward Securing AI Access?

The first, and often easiest, step is eliminating credentials from the conversation entirely.

Instead of asking users to paste passwords, API keys, or tokens into prompts, organizations can allow AI assistants to access enterprise systems through Akeyless SecretlessAI™.

With Akeyless SecretlessAI™:

  • Users never share credentials with the AI.
  • AI agents never own or permanently store credentials.
  • The Akeyless Gateway brokers access to enterprise systems on the agent’s behalf.
  • Authentication is based on identity and policy rather than embedded secrets.
  • When credentials are required by a target system, they are issued only for the approved task and automatically expire.
  • Secrets stay out of prompts, code, logs, and pipelines.

The AI performs the requested task without ever becoming a privileged identity.

Example: Connecting an AI assistant to SaaS applications

Consider a marketing employee who asks an AI assistant: “Create a dashboard using our HubSpot and Google Drive data.”

Without Akeyless, the AI typically needs API keys or OAuth tokens to access those services. Those credentials often end up in prompts, MCP configurations, local files, or environment variables, creating long-lived secrets that can be exposed or reused.

With Akeyless SecretlessAI™, the employee never shares credentials with the AI. Instead, the AI requests access through the Akeyless Gateway, which authenticates the user, applies policy, and brokers only the approved action. The AI completes the task without ever receiving or storing the underlying credentials.

For organizations already using Akeyless, this extends the same secretless model developers already use into AI workflows. Rather than embedding static credentials, AI agents receive short-lived identities issued only when needed.

Does Removing Credentials Solve the Entire Problem?

Not quite.

Removing credentials dramatically reduces the risk of accidental exposure.

But AI is evolving.

Many organizations are moving beyond assistants that simply retrieve information toward autonomous agents capable of executing production tasks.

At that point, a new question appears: Should the agent actually be allowed to perform this action?

That’s a different problem.

And it requires a different layer of security.

When Do You Need Runtime Authority?

Akeyless SecretlessAI™ eliminates standing credentials by brokering secure access to enterprise systems without exposing secrets to the AI.

Runtime Authority governs what the AI is allowed to do every time it requests access, continuously evaluating intent, policy, and runtime context before allowing an action.

Instead of relying only on static roles or permissions, Runtime Authority evaluates each request before access is granted.

It can:

  • Evaluate semantic intent before execution.
  • Grant just-in-time, task-scoped access.
  • Prevent agents from holding standing credentials.
  • Inspect live sessions.
  • Mask sensitive responses before they reach the AI.
  • Immediately terminate suspicious sessions.
  • Create a complete forensic chain from prompt → intent → policy → action.

For example:

An AI agent receives the prompt: “Analyze quarterly sales.”

If the agent attempts:

DROP TABLE customers;

traditional RBAC may still allow the database connection.

Runtime Authority evaluates whether that action matches the user’s intent before the database is ever touched.

How Do Akeyless SecretlessAI® and Runtime Authority Complement Each Other?

Think of them as two stages of AI identity maturity.

If your AI needs to…Akeyless
SecretlessAI®
Runtime Authority
Connect without passwords✅
Eliminate API keys from prompts✅
Use short-lived credentials✅
Execute production actions✅
Validate user intent✅
Enforce runtime policy✅
Mask sensitive responses✅
Stop unsafe actions mid-session✅

Organizations don’t have to solve every AI security challenge on day one.

Many can significantly improve security simply by eliminating shared credentials.

Runtime governance becomes increasingly valuable as AI agents begin taking autonomous actions across enterprise systems.

Isn’t This Only Relevant for Developers?

Not anymore.

Developers were simply the first group to encounter the problem.

Today, every department is experimenting with AI:

  • Marketing generating reports
  • Finance querying ERP systems
  • HR retrieving employee information
  • Customer support updating tickets
  • Sales interacting with CRM platforms

Whenever those AI assistants need credentials outside the SSO ecosystem, users face the same temptation:

Paste the password.

Paste the API key.

Paste the token.

That’s why AI identity security is becoming an enterprise-wide concern rather than a developer-only issue.

We’re Already Using Akeyless. Do We Need to Deploy Anything New?

Very little. If you’re already using Akeyless for developers, most of the foundation is already in place.

Your developers already use Akeyless to eliminate standing credentials from applications and infrastructure. Extending that model to AI is a natural next step. Instead of giving AI assistants passwords or API keys, they access enterprise systems through the same Akeyless platform your organization already operates.

In many environments, there is no need to deploy a separate AI security platform. Runtime Authority builds on the same Akeyless Gateway, authentication methods, identity integrations, and audit pipeline you already use. Enabling AI workflows becomes primarily a matter of connecting the target systems, defining agent policies, and routing AI access through the existing Akeyless infrastructure.

Why Is This Becoming Urgent Now?

AI is rapidly evolving from copilots that generate content into autonomous systems capable of executing business operations.

The 2026 State of AI Agent Identity Security report found that AI agents are already deeply embedded in enterprise environments, frequently accessing sensitive systems, while many organizations report concerns around credential exposure, excessive permissions, and fragmented identity governance.

The challenge is no longer preparing for future AI adoption.

It’s ensuring today’s AI workflows don’t become tomorrow’s security incidents.

Secure AI in Two Steps

Every organization adopting AI faces the same question:

Will users continue pasting credentials into AI conversations, or will AI receive secure, temporary access instead?

With Akeyless SecretlessAI®, organizations eliminate static credentials from AI workflows using just-in-time, short-lived identities.

As AI agents become increasingly autonomous, Runtime Authority builds on that foundation with intent-aware authorization, runtime governance, response masking, and complete forensic traceability.

Whether you’re securing today’s AI assistants or preparing for tomorrow’s autonomous agents, Akeyless provides a practical path from secretless access to full runtime control.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the difference between SSO and machine-to-machine authentication?

SSO authenticates human users across trusted applications. Machine-to-machine authentication secures how software, services, and AI agents access enterprise resources without relying on shared passwords or long-lived credentials.

Do I need Runtime Authority to stop users from sharing passwords with AI?

Not necessarily. Organizations can significantly reduce risk simply by adopting Akeyless SecretlessAI®, which replaces static credentials with just-in-time, short-lived access. Runtime Authority becomes valuable when AI agents begin executing actions across enterprise systems and require continuous runtime governance.

Can I start with Akeyless SecretlessAI® and add Runtime Authority later?

Yes. Akeyless positions SecretlessAI and Runtime Authority as complementary capabilities supporting different stages of AI adoption. Many organizations begin by eliminating credential exposure before introducing runtime policy enforcement and intent-aware authorization as AI becomes more autonomous.

Does Runtime Authority replace my Identity Provider?

No. Identity providers authenticate users. Runtime Authority governs what AI agents are allowed to do after authentication by evaluating intent, brokering access through the Akeyless Gateway, and enforcing policy throughout the runtime session.

Why is this relevant even if we’re just using AI assistants today?

Because credential exposure usually happens before organizations deploy fully autonomous AI. If employees are already using ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Cursor, or workflow automation tools to access systems outside the SSO ecosystem, they may already be tempted to paste passwords or API keys into prompts. Eliminating that behavior with secretless access is an immediate improvement, while Runtime Authority provides a natural next step as AI capabilities expand.

Never Miss an Update

 

The latest news and insights about Secrets Management,
Akeyless, and the community we serve.

 
  • G2 Fall 2026 Leader — Non-Human Identity Management
  • G2 Fall 2026 Momentum Leader — Privileged Access Management
  • G2 Fall 2026 High Performer — Certificate Lifecycle Management
  • G2 Fall 2026 Easiest To Do Business With — Secrets Management
  • G2 Fall 2026 Easiest To Use — Privileged Access Management, Enterprise
  • G2 Fall 2026 Best Support — Privileged Access Management, Enterprise

Ready to get started?

Discover how Akeyless simplifies secrets management, reduces sprawl, minimizes risk, and saves time.

Get a Demo